Key takeaways
- 1The Latarjet Procedure is a bone-augmentation shoulder stabilization operation used primarily for recurrent anterior instability when soft-tissue repair alone may be unreliable.
- 2A portion of the coracoid process is transferred to the front of the glenoid and fixed in place, commonly with two screws.
- 3The procedure provides stability through three complementary mechanisms: increasing the glenoid's bony surface, creating a dynamic sling with the conjoint tendon, and restoring anterior capsular support.
- 4Common indications include recurrent dislocation with glenoid bone loss, high-risk bipolar bone defects, failed previous Bankart repair and selected high-risk collision athletes.
- 5Latarjet surgery is particularly important when repeated instability has removed enough anterior glenoid bone that repairing the labrum alone may not recreate a sufficiently stable socket.
- 6Open Latarjet remains the most established technique. Arthroscopic Latarjet can also be performed but has a substantial learning curve and is concentrated in specialized centers.
- 7Most patients use a sling for approximately 3–6 weeks, but rehabilitation varies according to fixation, graft quality and associated procedures.
- 8Return to ordinary daily function happens long before unrestricted contact sport.
- 9Many athletes begin higher-level sport progression around four months, but contact, collision and hitting sports commonly require approximately 4–6 months or longer, with clearance based on strength, range of motion, graft healing and confidence.
- 10The procedure can achieve very durable stability, and contemporary comparative evidence generally shows lower recurrent instability after Latarjet than after isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in higher-risk populations.
- 11Latarjet is more invasive than standard arthroscopic labral repair and has procedure-specific risks such as graft nonunion, graft malposition, screw irritation, nerve injury and later arthritis.
- 12The scar from an open Latarjet is generally located on the front of the shoulder, often in the deltopectoral region. Length varies with body size, technique and whether the case is primary or revision.
- 13In U.S. CPT terminology, 23462 is commonly used for an open anterior capsulorrhaphy with coracoid process transfer. Coding depends on the exact procedure and payer rules and should always be verified by the treating institution.
- 14Correct patient selection is critical. The best procedure is determined by the combination of labral injury, glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs morphology, sport, previous surgery and recurrence risk.
Overview
The Latarjet Procedure is a shoulder stabilization operation in which part of the coracoid process is transferred to the front of the glenoid to increase socket bone and reduce recurrent anterior shoulder instability.
The coracoid is a hook-shaped piece of bone projecting from the shoulder blade. Several muscles and ligaments attach to it. During Latarjet surgery, the surgeon cuts a portion of the coracoid while preserving attachment of the conjoint tendon, prepares the graft and fixes it to the anterior-inferior glenoid.
The operation does more than fill a bone defect. The attached conjoint tendon also changes the dynamic mechanics of the shoulder when the arm enters positions in which anterior dislocation previously occurred.
For this reason, Latarjet is often described as providing a triple stabilizing effect.
What Problem Does Latarjet Surgery Treat?
The operation primarily treats recurrent anterior shoulder instability.
In anterior instability, the humeral head repeatedly moves toward or beyond the front edge of the glenoid.
An initial dislocation can tear the anterior-inferior labrum, producing a Bankart lesion.
Repeated episodes can progressively remove bone from the front of the glenoid and create a Hill-Sachs compression defect in the humeral head.
Once meaningful bone has been lost, simply repairing the labrum may no longer provide enough stability.
The Latarjet Procedure restores some of the missing anterior glenoid support.
Why Is the Shoulder Vulnerable to Dislocation?
The shoulder is designed for exceptional mobility.
The humeral head is much larger than the relatively shallow glenoid socket.
The labrum, capsule, ligaments, rotator cuff and surrounding muscles work together to maintain stability.
This design allows overhead movement but means trauma can dislocate the humeral head more easily than in a deep ball-and-socket joint such as the hip.
After repeated dislocations, both soft tissue and bone can become damaged.
What Is Glenoid Bone Loss?
The glenoid is the socket side of the shoulder.
When the humeral head repeatedly dislocates anteriorly, it can strike and erode the anterior glenoid rim.
The socket gradually becomes narrower.
A Bankart repair can restore the labrum but cannot replace missing bone.
At a certain point, the reduced bony surface itself becomes a major cause of instability.
The exact amount of bone loss that should trigger a Latarjet is not identical for every patient.
Modern decision-making considers bone loss together with age, sport, number of previous instability events and the Hill-Sachs lesion.
Critical and Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss
Historically, surgeons frequently discussed “critical” glenoid loss around very large defects.
Modern research has shown that failure of isolated Bankart repair can increase even at lower levels of bone loss, particularly in high-risk patients.
The term subcritical bone loss is therefore used for smaller defects that may still be clinically important.
There is no single percentage that should automatically determine surgery for every patient.
A young collision athlete with moderate bone loss and an important Hill-Sachs lesion can have a much greater recurrence risk than a low-demand patient with the same measured glenoid defect.
What Is a Hill-Sachs Lesion?
A Hill-Sachs lesion is an indentation in the humeral head caused when it impacts the anterior glenoid during dislocation.
Many Hill-Sachs lesions are small.
Others are large enough or positioned in such a way that they can engage the glenoid edge.
This creates a mechanism for recurrent dislocation even after the labrum is repaired.
The surgeon therefore evaluates both sides of the joint.
Bipolar Bone Loss
When both glenoid bone loss and a Hill-Sachs lesion are present, the shoulder has bipolar bone loss.
The interaction between these defects can be more important than either measurement alone.
Modern instability planning frequently uses the glenoid-track concept to estimate whether the humeral defect is likely to engage.
Patients with high-risk bipolar defects are more likely to need a bone-restoring operation such as Latarjet rather than isolated Bankart repair.
On-Track and Off-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions
An on-track Hill-Sachs lesion is less likely to engage the glenoid during normal shoulder motion.
An off-track lesion extends beyond the expected glenoid contact zone and has a greater risk of engagement.
This concept helps surgeons determine whether Bankart repair alone is likely to be sufficient.
Options for an off-track defect can include Bankart repair with remplissage or a glenoid bone-augmentation procedure such as Latarjet.
The choice depends on how much glenoid bone is missing and the demands placed on the shoulder.
What Is the Coracoid Process?
The coracoid is a bony projection from the scapula.
It sits at the front of the shoulder.
The short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis originate together from the coracoid as the conjoint tendon.
The pectoralis minor also attaches to the coracoid but is released from the portion used for transfer.
During Latarjet surgery, a segment of coracoid is harvested while maintaining the conjoint tendon attachment.
Why Is the Coracoid Transferred?
The coracoid provides a piece of the patient's own cortical and cancellous bone.
The graft is positioned against the deficient anterior glenoid.
If it heals successfully, the graft effectively widens the socket.
Using local autologous bone also avoids the need for a distant graft harvest site in standard Latarjet surgery.
The remaining coracoid and surrounding structures continue functioning after the transfer.
The Triple-Blocking Effect
The Latarjet Procedure is frequently described as providing three stabilizing mechanisms.
The first is the bone-block effect. The graft extends the anterior glenoid surface and creates greater containment for the humeral head.
The second is the sling effect. The conjoint tendon passes inferior to or through the subscapularis and creates dynamic resistance when the arm moves into abduction and external rotation.
The third is the capsular effect. The anterior capsule can be repaired to the transferred coracoacromial ligament stump or surrounding tissue depending on technique.
These mechanisms together help explain why Latarjet can remain effective in patients whose instability is too severe for a soft-tissue repair alone.
Latarjet Procedure vs Bankart Repair
A Bankart repair restores the torn labrum and capsule.
A Latarjet adds bone and a dynamic tendon sling.
Bankart repair is generally less invasive and remains an excellent operation for patients with appropriate soft-tissue instability and limited bone deficiency.
Latarjet becomes more attractive as bone loss, recurrence risk and previous failures increase.
The purpose of modern instability assessment is therefore not to determine which operation is universally “better,” but which procedure matches the patient's anatomy.
Does Latarjet Replace the Labrum?
No.
The operation does not recreate a normal native labrum.
Instead, it restores anterior stability using bone augmentation and tendon mechanics.
The surgeon can also repair the capsule as part of the reconstruction.
In some techniques, the capsule is repaired to tissue attached to the coracoid graft.
The final shoulder therefore has altered anatomy compared with a Bankart repair.
Latarjet vs Remplissage
Remplissage addresses a Hill-Sachs lesion by fixing the posterior capsule and infraspinatus into the humeral-head defect.
It does not restore missing glenoid bone.
Bankart repair plus remplissage can be highly effective in selected patients with a problematic Hill-Sachs lesion and limited glenoid bone loss.
Latarjet directly adds anterior glenoid bone.
When significant glenoid deficiency is the dominant problem, Latarjet or another bone-block reconstruction may be more appropriate.
Latarjet vs Eden-Hybinette
The Eden-Hybinette concept uses a free bone graft rather than the coracoid.
The graft can come from the iliac crest or another source.
This may be useful when the coracoid is unavailable, too small or has already been used in a previous Latarjet.
Distal tibial allograft and other anatomical bone-block reconstructions are additional alternatives.
These procedures are especially relevant in revision cases.
Latarjet After Failed Bankart Repair
Latarjet is frequently used after recurrent instability following a previous arthroscopic Bankart repair.
The surgeon reassesses bone loss rather than assuming the original soft-tissue repair simply “came loose.”
Repeated episodes can enlarge the glenoid defect or Hill-Sachs lesion.
A failed primary repair can therefore change the anatomy enough that a bone-block operation becomes more appropriate.
Published evidence shows that revision Latarjet can provide meaningful stability, although outcomes can be somewhat less predictable than after primary Latarjet.
Primary Latarjet
The procedure does not need to be reserved until another stabilization operation fails.
Primary Latarjet can be appropriate when the initial evaluation already demonstrates substantial bone loss or another high-risk pattern.
Performing an inadequate soft-tissue procedure first can expose the patient to unnecessary recurrent instability and further bone damage.
Procedure selection should therefore be anatomy-based from the beginning.
Latarjet for Contact Athletes
Collision and contact athletes place exceptional force on shoulder stabilization repairs.
Rugby, American football, combat sports and similar activities involve direct impact and unpredictable loading.
Latarjet is frequently considered when these athletes also have bone loss, recurrent dislocations or other high-risk factors.
Sport alone is not a universal indication, but competitive contact exposure changes the threshold at which the surgeon may favor more robust stabilization.
Latarjet for Overhead Athletes
Overhead athletes require stability but also depend on excellent external rotation.
The Latarjet Procedure can restore stability, but excessive restriction or altered mechanics can affect performance.
Pitchers and other elite throwing athletes therefore require particularly careful patient selection.
If bone loss does not justify coracoid transfer, another stabilization strategy can sometimes preserve the required motion more appropriately.
Latarjet for Seizure-Related Instability
Seizures can produce extremely strong involuntary muscular forces.
Shoulder instability in these patients can be difficult to manage and may involve substantial bone damage.
A bone-block procedure can be considered when anatomy warrants it.
However, uncontrolled seizures can place the reconstruction at significant risk.
Medical management of the seizure disorder is therefore a crucial part of surgical planning.
Latarjet for Hyperlaxity
Generalized joint laxity does not automatically mean Latarjet is necessary.
The procedure is most effective when instability has an anterior structural component, particularly bone loss.
Patients with multidirectional instability and normal bone can require a different soft-tissue strategy.
Correctly identifying the instability pattern prevents unnecessary bone transfer.
Open Latarjet
The open Latarjet is the most established version.
The surgeon makes an incision on the front of the shoulder, commonly through the deltopectoral interval.
The coracoid is exposed and cut.
The subscapularis is split, allowing access to the anterior glenoid.
The graft is positioned and fixed.
Open surgery offers direct visualization and remains widely considered the reference technique.
Arthroscopic Latarjet
Arthroscopic Latarjet performs the coracoid transfer using small portals and specialized instruments.
The theoretical advantages include arthroscopic visualization and smaller skin incisions.
However, it is technically demanding.
The learning curve is substantial, and complication risk during early surgeon experience can be important.
Current evidence has not established that every patient receives superior clinical results from an arthroscopic approach.
The operation should therefore be chosen based on surgeon expertise rather than marketing around incision size.
Bristow vs Latarjet
The Bristow and Latarjet procedures both use coracoid transfer but differ in graft orientation and the amount of coracoid transferred.
Terminology has sometimes been used loosely in clinical conversation.
Modern classic Latarjet generally transfers a larger coracoid segment and fixes it to the anterior glenoid.
The principles of bone augmentation and dynamic sling stabilization are related.
Congruent Arc Latarjet
In a traditional Latarjet, the inferior surface of the coracoid can form the new articular extension.
In a congruent-arc modification, the coracoid is rotated so another surface aligns with the glenoid.
This can potentially provide greater mediolateral graft width.
The trade-off is altered bone geometry and fixation considerations.
The technique is selected according to graft size, bone defect and surgeon preference.
Why Graft Position Matters
The coracoid should generally be positioned close to the articular plane.
A graft placed too far lateral can contact the humeral head and potentially contribute to cartilage wear and arthritis.
A graft placed too medial may fail to restore enough bony support.
Vertical position also matters.
Accurate graft placement is therefore one of the most important technical aspects of the operation.
Why Screw Position Matters
Traditional Latarjet fixation commonly uses two screws.
They need to compress the graft against the glenoid sufficiently for healing.
Screws that are excessively long can irritate posterior soft tissues.
Prominent anterior hardware can also create symptoms.
Modern technique emphasizes accurate length, trajectory and graft compression.
Can the Coracoid Graft Fail to Heal?
Yes.
The graft must unite biologically to the glenoid.
Most grafts heal, but delayed union or nonunion can occur.
Smoking, poor fixation, graft position and biological factors can influence healing.
This is one reason heavy loading is restricted during the early postoperative period.
Graft Resorption
Some remodeling or partial graft resorption can occur over time.
This does not automatically mean the procedure has failed.
The clinical importance depends on the amount of resorption, remaining stability and graft position.
CT can be used when healing or graft morphology needs detailed evaluation.
Latarjet and Arthritis
Recurrent instability itself can damage cartilage and contribute to later arthritis.
Latarjet can also alter joint mechanics if the graft is malpositioned.
Long-term studies show that some patients develop radiographic arthropathy many years after instability surgery.
Correct graft placement is important to reduce avoidable cartilage contact.
The procedure should therefore be used when the expected stability benefit justifies the reconstructive change.
Conditions treated
Who it's for
- Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with significant anterior glenoid bone loss
- Recurrent anterior subluxation associated with structural glenoid deficiency
- Failed previous arthroscopic Bankart repair with persistent instability
- Failed open soft-tissue stabilization in a shoulder with reconstructable anterior bone deficiency
- Off-track or high-risk bipolar bone loss when isolated soft-tissue repair is considered insufficient
- Anterior instability with a substantial Hill-Sachs lesion combined with clinically important glenoid bone loss
- Young high-demand athletes with recurrent instability and structural risk factors
- Collision or contact athletes with recurrent instability and a high predicted failure risk after Bankart repair alone
- Selected patients with subcritical bone loss plus multiple additional recurrence-risk factors
- Bony Bankart deficiency that cannot be reliably restored with simple fragment repair
- Revision stabilization after repeated instability has progressively damaged the anterior glenoid
- Selected seizure-related anterior instability when seizures are medically controlled and the anatomy supports coracoid transfer
Good candidates
A good candidate has recurrent anterior instability in which a bone-augmentation strategy provides a meaningful mechanical advantage over a soft-tissue repair alone.
This usually requires careful assessment of the glenoid and humeral head.
The decision should not be made solely because the patient has dislocated several times.
A patient with minimal bone loss and a straightforward Bankart lesion can still be better served by arthroscopic repair.
Conversely, a patient with major anterior bone deficiency can be poorly served by repeated labral repair.
Patients With Significant Glenoid Bone Loss
This is the classic Latarjet population.
The anterior socket has been reduced enough that replacing the soft-tissue bumper alone may not recreate stable containment.
The coracoid graft restores anterior bone.
The conjoint tendon adds dynamic restraint.
These patients often experience recurrent instability even during progressively lower-energy activities.
Failed Bankart Repair Patients
Failure can result from inadequate healing, a new traumatic event, untreated capsular laxity or underestimated bone loss.
Before revision, the surgeon should determine why the first repair failed.
If significant bone loss is now present, repeating the same soft-tissue operation can produce another failure.
Latarjet can provide a fundamentally different stabilization mechanism.
High-Risk Collision Athletes
Collision athletes frequently have strong motivation to return to the same demanding environment that caused or aggravated instability.
The reconstruction therefore needs to tolerate direct contact and unpredictable force.
Latarjet can be particularly attractive when bone loss or multiple instability events accompany that high demand.
The athlete should still understand that no operation makes the shoulder immune to future trauma.
Young Patients
Young age is a strong risk factor for recurrent instability after traumatic dislocation.
However, age alone does not automatically justify Latarjet.
The procedure is a structural reconstruction with its own long-term consequences.
A young patient with little bone loss can benefit from tissue-preserving stabilization.
A young athlete with substantial bone deficiency represents a different risk profile.
Revision Patients
Revision surgery is technically more difficult.
Previous anchors can damage the glenoid rim.
Scar tissue changes the anatomy.
The subscapularis and capsule may have been altered.
Coracoid transfer remains an effective option, but surgeons should counsel that outcomes after salvage Latarjet can differ from primary surgery.
Patients With Previous Remplissage
Some patients experience recurrent instability despite Bankart repair and remplissage.
Revision planning requires new CT evaluation.
The surgeon determines whether glenoid bone deficiency has progressed.
Latarjet may be appropriate if the anterior socket now requires structural augmentation.
Patients With Large Hill-Sachs Lesions
A large Hill-Sachs lesion alone does not automatically require Latarjet.
The relationship between humeral and glenoid bone loss matters.
If significant glenoid deficiency coexists, Latarjet can restore the glenoid track.
In selected cases with relatively preserved glenoid bone, Bankart repair plus remplissage may instead be sufficient.
Patients With Arthritis
Advanced glenohumeral arthritis can reduce the value of Latarjet.
If the primary source of pain is end-stage cartilage loss rather than instability, a stabilization operation will not restore the damaged joint surface.
The surgeon should therefore evaluate joint space and cartilage before offering coracoid transfer.
Poor Candidates
Latarjet may be inappropriate when the instability is primarily multidirectional without meaningful anterior structural deficiency.
Severe uncontrolled seizures can endanger the reconstruction.
Active infection is a contraindication to elective stabilization.
Advanced arthritis and certain irreparable bone-loss patterns can require different surgery.
A patient unable to follow rehabilitation restrictions may also face unacceptable graft and fixation risk.
Before surgery
Confirming the Instability Pattern
The surgeon begins by determining whether the shoulder truly has anterior instability.
The number and direction of dislocations are recorded.
The circumstances of each event matter.
A shoulder that now slips during sleep or simple daily movements can have substantially different structural damage from a shoulder that dislocated once during a major collision.
Subluxations also matter even when no formal reduction was required.
Physical Examination
Range of motion, rotator cuff strength and scapular control are assessed.
Apprehension testing evaluates anterior instability.
Relocation maneuvers can help confirm the direction of symptoms.
Generalized joint laxity is documented.
The surgeon also checks neurological status because repeated dislocations can affect the axillary nerve.
X-Rays
Radiographs show alignment and can demonstrate bone loss, Hill-Sachs defects and arthritis.
Special instability views can provide additional information.
Previous anchors or other implants are identified.
X-rays alone are often insufficient for precise surgical planning when a bone-block procedure is being considered.
CT Scan
CT is one of the most important planning tools for Latarjet surgery.
Three-dimensional reconstruction can quantify glenoid bone loss and reveal the shape of the anterior defect.
The Hill-Sachs lesion can also be characterized.
CT is particularly valuable after multiple dislocations or previous stabilization surgery.
MRI
MRI evaluates the labrum, capsule, rotator cuff and cartilage.
A Bankart lesion is common.
MRI can also reveal HAGL lesions, cuff damage or other associated pathology.
However, CT generally provides more accurate detail for the bony reconstruction question that drives Latarjet planning.
Both studies can therefore play complementary roles.
Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss
Several measurement methods exist.
The surgeon compares the damaged glenoid with an estimated intact contour and calculates how much width or surface is missing.
Small measurement differences can occur depending on technique.
Therefore, the final decision should not depend on one decimal percentage without considering the whole clinical context.
Glenoid Track Planning
The surgeon assesses whether the Hill-Sachs lesion is likely to remain within the available glenoid track.
This combines humeral and glenoid defects.
An off-track shoulder has a greater recurrence risk after isolated Bankart repair.
Latarjet increases the effective glenoid track by restoring anterior bone.
Reviewing Previous Operative Reports
For revision surgery, the original report is extremely useful.
It shows how many anchors were inserted, where the capsule was repaired and whether remplissage was performed.
Previous implant type can influence surgical exposure.
International patients should obtain these documents before traveling.
Previous Imaging
Old scans help demonstrate progression.
A patient can have little bone loss after the first dislocation and substantially more after repeated episodes.
Comparing images explains why an operation that was not necessary earlier can become appropriate later.
Trial of Nonsurgical Treatment
Recurrent instability with structural bone loss is less likely to be solved by strengthening alone.
Physical therapy can improve muscular control but cannot replace missing glenoid bone.
Nevertheless, some lower-demand patients can choose activity modification if instability is tolerable.
The decision depends on severity, recurrence risk and lifestyle.
Prehabilitation
Maintaining rotator cuff and scapular strength can assist postoperative recovery.
The patient should avoid activities likely to produce another dislocation.
Repeated instability before surgery can worsen bone loss.
Prehabilitation should therefore improve safe control rather than repeatedly testing the shoulder's limits.
Medical Assessment
Most Latarjet patients are young or middle-aged, but medical optimization remains important.
General anaesthesia and regional nerve block require appropriate assessment.
Cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological conditions are reviewed.
Seizure disorders deserve particular attention because uncontrolled episodes can jeopardize graft fixation.
Smoking
Nicotine is especially important in Latarjet because the coracoid graft needs to unite to the glenoid.
Smoking can impair bone healing.
Patients should stop before surgery and remain nicotine-free during graft union whenever possible.
This includes cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products.
Diabetes
Good glucose control supports wound healing and reduces infection risk.
Diabetes does not automatically prevent Latarjet surgery.
However, poorly controlled disease increases avoidable perioperative risk.
Anticoagulants
Blood thinners require an individualized plan.
Patients should never discontinue anticoagulants without approval from the prescribing team and surgeon.
Although shoulder surgery usually produces less blood loss than major joint replacement, the operation still requires safe perioperative coagulation management.
Infection Screening
Active skin infection near the shoulder should be treated before surgery.
Dental, urinary or other infections may also require evaluation depending on circumstances.
Routine extensive infection screening is not necessary for every healthy patient.
Preoperative protocols are individualized.
Preparing for the Sling
The operated arm will have restricted use for several weeks.
Front-opening shirts and easy-to-use clothing are practical.
The sling should be adjusted before discharge.
Patients should know whether it needs to remain on while sleeping.
Preparing the Home
Frequently used items should be moved within reach of the opposite arm.
Meals can be prepared in advance.
Patients who live alone should arrange help during the first days.
The dominant-arm shoulder can make personal care substantially more difficult.
Preparing for Sleep
A recliner or wedge pillow can make sleeping easier.
The upper body is often kept partly elevated.
Supporting the elbow prevents the arm from hanging forward.
The sling is commonly worn at night during early protection.
Return-to-Work Planning
Desk work can return well before heavy manual work.
The patient should discuss lifting, pushing and overhead duties with the surgeon.
A construction worker and software engineer require different leave periods.
Driving restrictions also influence return to an office.
Sport Planning
Athletes should provide the surgeon with specific information about their sport and position.
Return to football contact differs from return to jogging.
A rugby forward, boxer, basketball player and baseball pitcher place different stresses on the reconstruction.
The rehabilitation protocol should reflect these differences from the beginning.
How the operation is performed
The Latarjet Procedure transfers part of the coracoid process with its attached conjoint tendon to the anterior-inferior glenoid, where the graft is fixed to increase the socket's bony surface and create additional dynamic stability.
The operation usually involves coracoid exposure, osteotomy, graft preparation, access through the subscapularis, glenoid preparation, graft positioning and fixation.
The capsule is then managed according to the surgeon's technique.
Anaesthesia
General anaesthesia is commonly combined with an interscalene block.
The block provides strong postoperative analgesia.
The arm can remain numb and weak for several hours.
Patients receive instructions to protect the numb limb.
Beach-Chair Position
Many surgeons perform open Latarjet with the patient in a semi-seated beach-chair position.
This provides access to the front of the shoulder.
The head and neck are protected.
The anaesthesia team monitors blood pressure carefully.
Incision
An open Latarjet commonly uses an incision over the front of the shoulder.
The exact length varies.
In many adults, the resulting Latarjet procedure scar can be approximately 5–8 cm, although shorter or longer incisions are possible.
Revision surgery, body size and surgical exposure can alter scar length.
The quality of the scar depends on individual wound healing as much as on incision size.
Deltopectoral Approach
The surgeon identifies the interval between the deltoid and pectoralis major.
This is the same broad anatomical interval used in several other shoulder procedures.
The muscles are generally separated rather than cutting directly through the deltoid.
The cephalic vein is protected when possible.
Exposing the Coracoid
The coracoid is identified.
Soft-tissue attachments that need to remain with the graft are protected.
The coracoacromial ligament can be released while leaving a stump that can later be used for capsular repair.
The pectoralis minor is detached from the medial side of the graft segment.
Careful dissection is important because important nerves lie nearby.
Coracoid Osteotomy
The surgeon cuts the coracoid at a planned location.
Enough graft length is needed for secure fixation and meaningful bone augmentation.
The conjoint tendon remains attached to the distal graft.
The cut surface is prepared for later contact with the glenoid.
Preparing the Graft
The coracoid is shaped to create a broad flat bone surface.
Drill holes can be created before the graft is transferred.
The surgeon determines whether a classic or congruent-arc orientation will be used.
The goal is secure compression against the glenoid with an articular contour that does not protrude excessively.
Subscapularis Split
Rather than detaching the entire subscapularis tendon, classic Latarjet often uses a horizontal split through the muscle or tendon region.
The split creates a pathway to the anterior capsule and glenoid.
The exact level of the split influences graft access and postoperative function.
The axillary nerve is protected inferiorly.
Capsulotomy
The anterior capsule is opened.
The surgeon gains access to the anterior glenoid neck.
Previous Bankart repair sutures or scar tissue can be encountered in revision cases.
The capsule is preserved where possible for later repair.
Preparing the Glenoid
The anterior glenoid neck is exposed.
Scar tissue is removed.
The bone surface is lightly prepared to create a vascular bed for graft healing.
This step helps the transferred coracoid unite with the scapula.
Excessive removal of glenoid bone is avoided.
Positioning the Coracoid Graft
The graft is placed along the anterior-inferior glenoid.
Its position needs to restore the missing socket without projecting too far laterally.
The lower part of the glenoid is particularly important because anterior instability commonly occurs through this region.
The surgeon checks both height and mediolateral alignment.
Screw Fixation
Traditional Latarjet commonly uses two screws.
The screws pass through the graft into the glenoid neck.
Compression across the bone interface encourages union.
The surgeon selects length carefully to avoid excessive posterior prominence.
Washers or specialized fixation systems can be used depending on technique.
Alternative Fixation
Cortical buttons and other fixation methods have been developed.
They can reduce certain screw-related problems.
However, screws have a long history and remain widely used.
No implant can compensate for poor graft position or inadequate preparation.
The important principles are stable fixation, correct graft orientation and biological union.
Capsular Repair
The capsule can be repaired to the coracoacromial ligament stump or reconstructed in another manner according to technique.
Some surgeons leave the graft extra-articular by closing the capsule between the humeral head and graft.
This can potentially reduce direct graft contact with the articular surface.
Capsular management also contributes to stability.
The Sling Effect
The transferred conjoint tendon passes through or beneath the subscapularis region.
When the shoulder moves into abduction and external rotation, the tendon becomes positioned in front of the inferior subscapularis.
This creates a dynamic restraint against anterior translation.
This mechanism is especially important when the arm moves toward a vulnerable dislocation position.
Bone-Block Effect
Once the graft unites, the glenoid is effectively wider.
The humeral head has more anterior bony support.
This directly addresses one of the central reasons Bankart repair can fail when bone loss is substantial.
Why the Coracoid Graft Must Be Flush
A lateral graft can contact the humeral head.
Repeated contact can damage cartilage and contribute to arthropathy.
A very medial graft can leave inadequate support.
The surgeon therefore aims for a graft position that restores the glenoid contour without excessive prominence.
Intraoperative Imaging
Some surgeons use fluoroscopy, navigation or other imaging assistance.
These technologies can help evaluate graft and screw position.
They are not mandatory for every case.
Experienced surgeons can achieve accurate placement using anatomical landmarks and direct visualization.
Arthroscopic Latarjet Technique
Arthroscopic Latarjet follows similar biomechanical principles.
The surgeon releases and prepares the coracoid arthroscopically.
Special guides help drill and transfer the graft.
The glenoid is prepared through arthroscopic portals.
The procedure provides extensive visualization but requires high-level arthroscopic skill.
Is Arthroscopic Latarjet Better?
Current evidence does not justify describing arthroscopic Latarjet as universally superior.
Both open and arthroscopic approaches can produce good outcomes.
Arthroscopic surgery can produce smaller scars and allows detailed intra-articular assessment, but it has a significant learning curve and can take longer during early experience.
The surgeon's proficiency with the chosen method is more important than selecting a technique because it sounds less invasive.
Revision Latarjet Technique
Revision cases can involve previous anchors, scar tissue and altered anatomy.
The surgeon removes interfering hardware when necessary.
Glenoid bone loss is reassessed.
The coracoid remains available in most patients who previously had only soft-tissue repair.
The technical complexity is greater, and operative time can increase.
What If the Coracoid Is Too Small?
Most patients have enough coracoid for standard transfer.
In unusual cases, bone anatomy or previous surgery makes the graft unsuitable.
The surgeon can then consider iliac crest graft, distal tibial allograft or another bone-block reconstruction.
Preoperative CT helps anticipate these situations.
How Long Does Latarjet Surgery Take?
A typical Latarjet Procedure commonly takes approximately one to two hours.
Straightforward primary open cases can be completed within this range.
Revision surgery, difficult bone anatomy or arthroscopic technique can take longer.
Total time at the hospital also includes anaesthesia preparation and postoperative recovery.
Is the Coracoid Put Back Later?
No.
The transferred coracoid becomes part of the anterior glenoid reconstruction.
It is intended to unite permanently with the socket.
The shoulder does not require the coracoid to be returned to its original location.
Do the Screws Stay Forever?
Usually, yes.
If the screws are well positioned and asymptomatic, they generally remain.
Hardware can be removed if it causes irritation or another specific problem after the graft has united.
Routine screw removal is not necessary.
Hospital stay
Same-Day or Overnight Surgery
Many healthy patients can undergo Latarjet as outpatient surgery.
Others remain one night.
The choice depends on hospital protocol, pain, anaesthesia, medical conditions and travel considerations.
International patients can benefit from an overnight stay when early monitoring is desirable.
Recovery Room
The patient is monitored as anaesthesia wears off.
Pain, circulation and neurological status are checked.
The arm can remain numb from the interscalene block.
The sling is already in place.
Pain Control
Open Latarjet can cause significant early soreness because bone and muscle planes are involved.
A nerve block can substantially reduce pain during the first postoperative hours.
Oral medication is started before the block completely disappears.
Pain should gradually decrease during the first week.
Postoperative X-Rays
Radiographs document the position of the coracoid graft and screws.
They also provide a baseline for future comparison.
CT is not routinely required immediately after every uncomplicated operation.
It can be used later when graft union or position needs more detailed assessment.
Sling
A sling commonly remains in use for several weeks.
The purpose is to protect the graft, capsule and surgical approach.
Finger, wrist and elbow movement is usually permitted.
Shoulder exercises are introduced according to protocol.
Wound Care
The incision is covered with a sterile dressing.
Mild bruising is common.
Persistent drainage, fever or increasing redness should be reported.
The wound needs to heal before swimming or soaking.
Discharge
The patient receives medication, sling instructions and a rehabilitation protocol.
The first postoperative review is scheduled.
International patients should also have clear instructions on when they can fly and how follow-up imaging will be shared after returning home.
Recovery
Latarjet Procedure Recovery
Major recovery after a Latarjet Procedure generally takes about four to six months, while high-demand strength, collision sport and confidence can continue improving for six to nine months or longer.
The small skin wound does not define recovery.
The transferred coracoid must unite to the glenoid.
The capsule and subscapularis region also need to heal.
Rehabilitation therefore gradually increases load rather than immediately testing the stability of the reconstruction.
Latarjet Procedure Rehabilitation Protocol
A typical Latarjet procedure rehabilitation protocol moves through five broad priorities: protection of the bone block, restoration of controlled motion, recovery of active shoulder control, progressive strengthening and finally return-to-sport training.
Individual protocols differ.
A revision Latarjet can progress more slowly than a primary procedure.
Athletes also require additional sport-specific stages after ordinary daily function has returned.
Days 0–14
The shoulder remains protected in a sling.
Pain and swelling gradually improve.
Hand, wrist and elbow motion is encouraged.
Early shoulder exercises can include gentle pendulum or passive movement according to the surgeon's instructions.
Forceful external rotation is avoided because it stresses the anterior reconstruction.
Weeks 2–4
The incision usually heals substantially.
Passive and assisted shoulder movement progresses.
The graft remains in an early stage of biological union.
The patient should not lift, push or pull simply because pain is improving.
Protection at this stage is based on biology rather than symptoms.
Weeks 4–6
Many patients begin reducing sling use.
Range of motion advances.
External rotation remains gradual.
Active movement increases as control returns.
The patient often feels significantly more independent during this period but remains far from contact-sport readiness.
Weeks 6–8
The shoulder begins functioning more naturally.
Light rotator cuff and scapular strengthening can start when approved.
The graft continues consolidating.
Follow-up radiographs help assess the reconstruction.
A surgeon can request CT if union is uncertain or if high-level sport progression depends on confirming graft healing.
Weeks 8–12
Strength training becomes more structured.
The patient increases active elevation, rotational control and endurance.
Closed-chain exercises can be introduced progressively.
Heavy bench press, overhead lifting and collision remain inappropriate.
The focus is high-quality movement rather than maximal resistance.
Months 3–4
Most ordinary daily activities become easier.
Work-specific strengthening progresses.
Running and broader conditioning can often increase.
Noncontact sport drills can begin in selected athletes.
The shoulder should demonstrate stable pain-free motion before loading becomes aggressive.
Months 4–6
Many athletes enter a formal return-to-play phase.
Strength is compared with the opposite side.
Sport-specific movement, pushing, catching, controlled contact and overhead tasks can be introduced progressively.
Return to competition should not be based on the calendar alone.
Months 6–9
High-demand athletes continue developing power, endurance and confidence.
Collision athletes increase uncontrolled contact exposure gradually.
Throwing athletes progress through an interval programme.
Patients who underwent revision Latarjet can require additional time.
How Long Is the Sling Worn?
Approximately 3–6 weeks is common.
Some protocols discontinue the sling closer to three or four weeks.
Others maintain protection for six weeks.
The exact duration depends on graft fixation, surgeon preference, associated procedures and patient reliability.
Why Is External Rotation Restricted?
External rotation places tension across the front of the shoulder.
The capsule and subscapularis region need time to recover.
Too much rotation early can stress healing tissues.
The goal is not permanent restriction.
External rotation is gradually restored as biological healing progresses.
Will I Lose External Rotation Permanently?
Some patients have a small reduction in external rotation after stabilization.
For ordinary daily activities, this can be clinically minor.
Throwing athletes can notice smaller changes.
Accurate graft position, appropriate capsular tensioning and good rehabilitation reduce unnecessary motion loss.
Latarjet Procedure Rehabilitation Protocol Return to Play Hitting Sports
For patients searching “latarjet procedure rehabilitation protocol return to play hitting sports,” the central principle is that collision and hitting sports return after graft healing, strength restoration and functional testing, not simply when pain disappears.
Many athletes reach a return-to-sport window around four to six months.
Full collision exposure can take longer, especially after revision surgery.
The athlete should demonstrate near-symmetrical strength, stable full-speed sport movements and confidence before unrestricted contact.
Return to Rugby
Rugby places substantial contact force across the shoulder.
Passing and conditioning return before tackling.
Controlled contact drills then precede unrestricted match play.
Forwards can experience different shoulder demands from backs.
Return commonly occurs around several months rather than weeks.
Return to American Football
Position matters.
A quarterback has different demands from a lineman.
Blocking and tackling require contact readiness.
Throwing positions require advanced external rotation and power.
The rehabilitation programme should therefore reflect the athlete's actual role.
Return to Combat Sports
Boxing, judo, wrestling, MMA and similar sports combine impact, traction and unpredictable shoulder positions.
Bag work or technique drilling can return before sparring.
Grappling places particularly strong forces on the shoulder.
Unrestricted combat should wait until strength, bone healing and reaction control have recovered.
Return to Basketball
Basketball generally returns sooner than full collision sport but still involves falls, rebounding and unexpected arm contact.
Shooting can be introduced relatively early in sport-specific rehabilitation.
Competitive play waits until the shoulder can tolerate contact and overhead activity.
Return to Soccer
Field players place less repetitive upper-limb demand on the shoulder than rugby athletes.
However, falls and collisions remain relevant.
Goalkeepers have substantially higher shoulder requirements because of diving and overhead catching.
Their return-to-play progression is therefore longer and more specialized.
Return to Baseball
Throwing after Latarjet requires particular caution.
Ordinary strength can return well before the shoulder tolerates repetitive high-velocity throwing.
A structured interval throwing programme gradually increases distance and velocity.
Pitchers may require six to nine months or longer.
Return to Swimming
Swimming involves thousands of repeated overhead movements.
Patients restore full comfortable motion before increasing swimming volume.
Easy pool work begins before high-intensity butterfly, freestyle or backstroke sessions.
Competitive swimmers should progress volume gradually to avoid overload.
Gym Training
Lower-body and cardiovascular training can continue relatively early when the shoulder is protected.
Upper-body resistance starts gradually after the protection phase.
Machines and controlled cable exercises can precede free weights.
Heavy pressing and pull-ups are later activities.
Bench Press
Bench pressing places substantial force through the anterior shoulder.
Light pressing can eventually return when graft healing and shoulder strength are satisfactory.
Depth and load are increased gradually.
Immediate return to heavy maximal bench press after sling discontinuation would be inappropriate.
Push-Ups
Wall push-ups can progress to elevated and eventually floor push-ups.
This creates a graded closed-chain progression.
Form should remain controlled.
The patient should avoid sudden deep loading before strength has returned.
Pull-Ups
Pull-ups create traction and high muscular demand.
They are generally reintroduced later than basic strengthening.
Assisted variations can be used first.
Pain or apprehension is a reason to slow progression.
Weightlifting
Olympic weightlifting and powerlifting create very high shoulder forces.
A specialized return programme is appropriate.
The graft can be united while neuromuscular control remains inadequate for maximal lifts.
Return to heavy competition therefore requires more than imaging.
Running
Walking begins immediately.
Jogging can return once the shoulder is comfortable and the sling is no longer interfering with balance.
Falls remain a consideration.
Trail running and higher-fall-risk activity can be delayed longer.
Cycling
Stationary cycling is an early cardiovascular option.
Outdoor cycling creates fall risk.
Mountain biking creates even greater risk and upper-body load.
The patient should therefore separate cardiovascular readiness from accident risk.
Driving
Driving should wait until the sling is no longer necessary, sedating medication has stopped and the patient can control the vehicle safely.
Several weeks are commonly required.
Emergency steering is more demanding than normal steering in a parking area.
Desk Work
Desk-based work can often resume within one to three weeks.
The arm should remain supported.
Typing can be uncomfortable while the sling is used.
Working remotely often allows an earlier gradual return.
Manual Work
Heavy work requires much more recovery.
Lifting, pushing and overhead duties can remain restricted for three to six months.
Workers exposed to sudden loads need shoulder strength approaching normal.
Modified duty can significantly shorten time away from employment.
Sleeping
A reclined position is commonly more comfortable initially.
The sling is often worn at night.
A pillow beneath the elbow provides support.
Patients should avoid sleeping directly on the operated shoulder during early healing.
Sleeping on the Operated Side
Side sleeping returns when the incision is healed, direct pressure is comfortable and the surgeon has removed relevant restrictions.
This is commonly later than the patient expects.
Pain rather than instability often determines when direct pressure becomes comfortable.
Showering
Patients follow wound instructions.
The arm should remain within movement restrictions.
The incision should not be soaked until fully healed.
Front-opening clothing remains practical after showering.
Latarjet Procedure Scar
An open Latarjet leaves a scar on the front of the shoulder.
It frequently follows the deltopectoral region and can be approximately 5–8 cm, though size varies considerably.
The scar is initially red or darker and can feel firm.
Over several months it usually softens and fades.
Patients prone to hypertrophic or keloid scars can develop a more visible result regardless of incision length.
Scar Care
Once the incision is completely healed, silicone-based scar products can be considered according to clinician advice.
Sun protection is important because ultraviolet exposure can darken immature scars.
Massage is sometimes introduced after healing.
Patients should not apply products to an incompletely closed wound.
Pain During Recovery
Pain is strongest during the early postoperative period and should progressively improve.
Muscular soreness can occur as strengthening begins.
A sudden increase after trauma deserves evaluation.
Deep persistent pain associated with clicking or loss of function can indicate a graft or hardware problem.
Clicking After Latarjet
Some clicking can come from soft tissue and may be painless.
Mechanical painful clicking can occasionally relate to hardware or graft position.
Persistent symptoms deserve imaging.
A click alone does not establish that the graft has failed.
Numbness Around the Scar
Small areas of skin numbness can develop around any surgical incision.
This often improves gradually.
Numbness extending significantly down the arm or associated with weakness requires neurological assessment.
Graft Healing
Bone union usually develops over the first several months.
Radiographs demonstrate overall position.
CT provides more precise assessment if required.
High-risk sport clearance can incorporate imaging when the surgeon wants objective confirmation of union.
What Happens if the Graft Does Not Unite?
A nonunion does not always produce immediate instability.
Some patients remain clinically stable because the sling mechanism persists.
Symptomatic nonunion, hardware problems or recurrent instability can require revision.
Smoking cessation and correct activity restrictions reduce avoidable risk.
Recovery timeline
- Protect the coracoid transfer and control postoperative pain.1Protect the coracoid transfer and control postoperative pain.
Days 0–14
The patient wears the sling, maintains hand, wrist and elbow movement and performs only approved shoulder exercises. The graft depends heavily on mechanical fixation at this stage. Heavy use of the arm is prohibited even when the nerve block or medication provides good pain relief.
- Maintain graft protection while restoring controlled shoulder movement.2Maintain graft protection while restoring controlled shoulder movement.
Weeks 2–6
Passive and active-assisted motion increase gradually. External rotation is progressed cautiously. The sling is eventually weaned. The graft is beginning biological union but is not ready for heavy loading.
- Restore active motion and begin progressive muscular control.3Restore active motion and begin progressive muscular control.
Weeks 6–12
Rotator cuff, deltoid and scapular strengthening develops. The patient regains ordinary functional use. Resistance remains controlled. Imaging can be used to assess graft position and healing.
- Develop strength, endurance and noncontact athletic function.4Develop strength, endurance and noncontact athletic function.
Months 3–4
Resistance exercises become more demanding. Work-specific tasks and noncontact sport drills are introduced. The athlete begins regaining speed and confidence while avoiding uncontrolled collision.
- Prepare for return to contact, collision and hitting sports.5Prepare for return to contact, collision and hitting sports.
Months 4–6
Functional testing assesses strength, range of motion and stability. Controlled contact and increasingly realistic sport drills are introduced. Clearance depends on graft healing and objective performance rather than time alone.
- Restore high-demand competitive performance.6Restore high-demand competitive performance.
Months 6–9+
Collision exposure, maximal throwing and heavy lifting are progressively resumed. Revision patients and elite overhead athletes can require additional time. Continued rotator cuff and scapular strengthening remains important after formal rehabilitation ends.
Outcomes and success rates
How Successful Is the Latarjet Procedure?
The Latarjet Procedure has a strong record for restoring stability in appropriately selected patients with recurrent anterior instability.
It is particularly valuable when bone loss makes isolated Bankart repair unreliable.
Long-term comparative reviews generally show lower recurrent instability and fewer stabilization revisions after open Latarjet than after arthroscopic Bankart repair in higher-risk populations.
However, Latarjet is also a more complex operation with its own graft-, hardware- and nerve-related complications.
Recurrent Instability
Recurrent dislocation after a properly performed Latarjet is relatively uncommon compared with many high-risk soft-tissue stabilization populations.
The exact rate varies among studies.
Primary operations generally perform better than salvage operations after multiple previous failures.
Recurrence can result from graft malposition, graft resorption, new major trauma, unrecognized multidirectional laxity or other causes.
Latarjet vs Bankart Long-Term Stability
Recent systematic reviews examining long-term results continue to show an advantage for Latarjet in recurrence and revision rates.
This does not mean Latarjet should replace Bankart repair in low-risk shoulders.
A procedure that provides greater stability through bone transfer can also create greater surgical morbidity.
The clinical objective is to use the least invasive procedure that reliably matches the patient's recurrence risk.
Return to Sport
Most athletic series show that a large majority of patients return to some form of sport.
Return to the exact preinjury competitive level is less consistent.
Shoulder symptoms are only one reason athletes do not return.
Recent systematic reviews highlight psychological readiness, fear of reinjury and life circumstances as important influences.
Return to Collision Sport
Collision athletes generally have favorable return-to-play rates after successful Latarjet.
The return timeline commonly centers around several months.
However, studies use different criteria.
Some clear athletes largely by time, whereas others require strength, motion and imaging milestones.
A criteria-based approach is more defensible than one fixed date.
Primary vs Revision Latarjet Outcomes
Both primary and revision Latarjet can improve stability.
Revision surgery after failed Bankart repair tends to involve more scar tissue and a more complex instability history.
Systematic evidence suggests revision Latarjet can have higher recurrent instability or complication burden than primary coracoid transfer.
Patients should therefore understand that avoiding repeated inadequate stabilization attempts can preserve future treatment options.
Graft Union
The majority of transferred coracoid grafts unite.
Union is encouraged by good bone preparation and compression.
CT studies can identify partial union, resorption or graft remodeling more sensitively than radiographs.
Clinical stability does not always perfectly correlate with CT appearance because the procedure has more than one stabilizing mechanism.
Range of Motion
Most patients recover good functional motion.
A small loss of external rotation can occur.
This is more consequential for elite throwing athletes than for ordinary daily life.
Appropriate capsular tension and rehabilitation are important for minimizing unnecessary restriction.
Strength
Strength generally improves progressively over several months.
The conjoint tendon remains attached but its anatomical position changes.
Subscapularis splitting and postoperative protection initially reduce strength.
Most patients return to strong functional use after rehabilitation.
Long-Term Arthritis
Anterior instability itself increases long-term arthropathy risk.
Repeated dislocation can damage cartilage before surgery.
Latarjet patients can develop degenerative radiographic changes years later.
A lateral graft is an important modifiable risk because direct contact with the humeral head can contribute to wear.
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction is generally high when recurrent instability is eliminated and the person returns to valued activity.
Some patients remain dissatisfied despite stability because of motion loss, pain, fear or inability to return to preinjury sport.
Preoperative expectations should therefore address both stability and performance.
Durability
Latarjet is intended as a durable permanent reconstruction.
The coracoid becomes part of the glenoid once united.
There is no routine scheduled replacement as there is with a joint prosthesis.
Further surgery is needed only when complications or recurrent instability occur.
Implants and technology
Coracoid Autograft
The central “implant” is actually the patient's own coracoid bone.
Using autograft eliminates donor-graft rejection concerns.
The bone contains living biological material capable of uniting with the glenoid.
The graft also carries the conjoint tendon.
Cortical Screws
Two cortical screws are commonly used in classic Latarjet fixation.
They compress the graft against the glenoid.
Screw diameter and length depend on the system and patient anatomy.
Prominent hardware can occasionally cause symptoms.
Cannulated Screws
Cannulated screws pass over guidewires.
This can help control trajectory.
They remain one of several accepted fixation options.
The surgeon should avoid screws that are too short for compression or too long posteriorly.
Cortical Buttons
Button fixation is an alternative to screws.
A tensioned construct secures the coracoid against the glenoid.
The technique can reduce some hardware prominence issues.
Evidence continues to evolve regarding comparative union and stability.
Positioning Guides
Specialized guides assist graft drilling and placement.
They can help produce parallel screw trajectories.
Accurate use remains dependent on surgical technique.
A guide does not automatically guarantee a flush graft.
Arthroscopic Latarjet Systems
Specialized arthroscopic systems include guides, cannulas, graspers and transfer devices.
They allow coracoid preparation and positioning through arthroscopic portals.
These systems facilitate a technically demanding operation but require substantial training.
3D CT
Three-dimensional CT is one of the most valuable technologies for planning Latarjet surgery.
It demonstrates the amount and pattern of glenoid bone loss.
It also visualizes the Hill-Sachs lesion.
Postoperative CT can assess graft position and union when clinically necessary.
Glenoid Track Calculation
The glenoid-track concept is a planning method rather than an implant.
It helps the surgeon understand bipolar bone loss.
This can prevent undertreatment with Bankart repair alone.
It can also prevent unnecessary bone-block surgery in patients whose defects remain manageable with a less invasive reconstruction.
Patient-Specific Planning
Advanced software can reconstruct the glenoid in three dimensions.
The surgeon can estimate the native contour and plan graft position.
Patient-specific guides are evolving.
The fundamental goals remain correct anatomy and stable fixation.
Navigation
Computer navigation is being explored for shoulder stabilization and graft positioning.
The potential benefit is greater control of trajectory and position.
It is not required for successful standard Latarjet.
Long-term evidence is still developing.
Risks and how they are managed
All surgery carries risk. Partner hospitals follow enhanced-recovery and infection-prevention protocols, and your surgeon will discuss the risks specific to your case before consent.
- Recurrent instability: The shoulder can dislocate or subluxate again, particularly after major new trauma or in high-risk revision patients.
- Coracoid graft nonunion: The transferred graft can fail to unite completely with the glenoid.
- Delayed union: Bone healing can take longer than expected.
- Graft resorption: Part of the coracoid can remodel or resorb over time.
- Graft fracture: The transferred coracoid can crack during preparation, fixation or later trauma.
- Lateral graft placement: A graft positioned too far laterally can contact the humeral head and increase cartilage wear.
- Medial graft placement: A graft positioned too far medially may provide insufficient anterior bone support.
- High or low graft placement: Incorrect vertical position can reduce the effectiveness of stabilization.
- Screw irritation: Screws can become painful or prominent after graft healing.
- Screw loosening: Hardware can lose fixation.
- Screw breakage: Hardware failure is uncommon but possible.
- Posterior screw prominence: Excessively long screws can irritate structures behind the glenoid.
- Hardware removal: Symptomatic screws can require a later operation after graft union.
- Musculocutaneous nerve injury: The nerve lies close to the transferred conjoint tendon and can be stretched or injured.
- Axillary nerve injury: The nerve can be at risk around the subscapularis and inferior shoulder.
- Suprascapular nerve injury: Excessively long posterior screws can potentially endanger nearby structures.
- Brachial plexus injury: Significant neurological injury is uncommon but potentially serious.
- Temporary nerve symptoms: Neuropraxia can produce numbness or weakness and may recover gradually.
- Blood-vessel injury: Major vascular injury is rare.
- Infection: Superficial or deep infection can occur.
- Bleeding or hematoma: Blood can collect around the surgical site.
- Shoulder stiffness: Scar formation or over-tightening can reduce range of motion.
- Loss of external rotation: A small reduction can occur and may be particularly relevant to throwing athletes.
- Persistent pain: Stability can improve while pain remains because of cartilage damage, stiffness or hardware irritation.
- Subscapularis weakness: Splitting and rehabilitation of the subscapularis region can temporarily reduce strength.
- Coracoid donor-site problems: Symptoms can occur around the remaining coracoid and attached tissues.
- Progressive arthritis: Degenerative changes can develop over time, influenced by previous instability and graft position.
- Failure to return to previous sport level: Athletes can remain stable but fail to regain previous performance.
- Need for revision stabilization: Recurrent instability or failed graft reconstruction can require another bone-block procedure.
- Blood clots: Venous thromboembolism is uncommon but possible.
- Anaesthetic complications: General and regional anaesthesia carry respiratory, neurological and cardiovascular risks.
- Scar-related symptoms: The open incision can develop numbness, hypertrophy or keloid formation in susceptible individuals.
Alternatives
- Structured physical therapy: Can improve rotator cuff and scapular control in selected patients whose instability is manageable without reconstruction.
- Activity modification: Avoiding collision or high-risk shoulder positions can reduce recurrence for patients who do not want surgery.
- Arthroscopic Bankart repair: Appropriate for many patients with repairable anterior labral injury and limited bone loss.
- Bankart repair with capsular plication: Adds capsular tightening when soft-tissue laxity contributes to instability.
- Bankart repair plus remplissage: Useful in selected patients with limited glenoid bone loss and a clinically important Hill-Sachs lesion.
- Open Bankart repair: An alternative soft-tissue stabilization in selected cases.
- Bony Bankart fixation: A reconstructable acute glenoid fragment can sometimes be repaired rather than replaced with a coracoid graft.
- Eden-Hybinette / iliac crest bone graft: Uses a free bone graft to reconstruct the anterior glenoid, especially when the coracoid cannot be used.
- Distal tibial allograft: Provides an osteochondral bone graft option for selected glenoid reconstruction cases.
- Other free bone-block reconstruction: Can be used for major deficiency or failed previous Latarjet.
- Observation: Reasonable for selected low-demand patients who can tolerate occasional symptoms and understand recurrence risk.
What Latarjet Procedure costs
The contracted Turkey partner package next to approved self-pay benchmarks. Benchmarks are 20th–80th percentile ranges of approved records, normalised to USD.
Turkey package
$5,500 – $8,500
United States self-pay
$19,150 – $42,600
United Kingdom self-pay
$7,750 – $20,450
Germany self-pay
$6,700 – $18,050
Typical self-pay range by country
Surgeons who perform Latarjet Procedure
All surgeonsSources and references
Peer-reviewed guidance and institutional sources used to write and review this page.
- 01Foundational patient guidance on recurrent shoulder instability, Bankart injury, glenoid bone loss and surgical stabilization options.
OrthoInfo
https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases--conditions/chronic-shoulder-instability/
- 02Long-term systematic review comparing open Latarjet with arthroscopic Bankart repair. It found lower recurrent instability and revision rates after Latarjet across the included long-term literature, while arthropathy remained an important outcome for both procedures.
Arthroscopy, 2025
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000088
- 03Comparative evidence involving more than 1,600 patients, supporting lower recurrent instability after open Latarjet, particularly in patients with significant glenoid bone loss or multiple preoperative dislocations. PubMed Central (PMC)
Systematic review and meta-analysis / PMC, 2025
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12340203
- 04Contemporary meta-analysis comparing recurrent instability, redislocation and functional outcomes after the two major stabilization strategies
Journal of Orthopaedics, 2025
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0972978X25002892
- 05Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing primary coracoid transfer with Latarjet performed after failed previous stabilization.
Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research / PubMed, 2025
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38159640/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- 06Systematic review examining return-to-play outcomes and psychological factors affecting return after Latarjet surgery.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2025




















